The VA Loan Specialist Team Putting Veterans First

Home

Apply Now!

Payment Calculator

Amortization Schedule

Contact Us!

Benefits of using your VA Home Loan

Common Questions

Rate Tracker

Forms

Things needed for a VA Loan


Creekside Mortgage

NMLS #70358



US Department of Veterans Affairs - Home Loans Program

Request Military Records Here


Article Archives for Spokane, Washington VA Home Loans - Since 2005    (Page 2)


Thank You For 2009

December 30th, 2009

Creekside Mortgage would like to thank all of our 2009 clients.for their business this past year.  We would also like to take this time to share with you something we are proud of.  Our charity work!  Each loan officer at Creekside Mortgage donates a portion of their earnings from every loan closed to our charity fund.  It is really true that giving is much more gratifying then receiving!  I know I blogged Monday about Operation Homefront, but there were several other charities we were able to contribute to that I would lke to mention today.   

 

Special Warrior Operation Foundation - $100 contribution with every VA home purchase loan we complete.  This we have the Greenwald family to thank for setting this up.  Kerry Greenwald, the owner of Creekside Mortgage, Becky Greenwald, Kerry’s lovely wife and our CFO, and Floyd Greenwald, Kerry’s father and a senior VA loan officer.

 

FISH - Friends In Service to Humanity – Vancouver, WA - a pallet of food, including a gob(ble) of turkeys; Carole Collett-Wheeler, Mike Frakes and I donated our time sorting food from the Walk and Knock; and we held a Winter Weather Clothing Drive that brought in 4 huge boxes of warm clothing!  Special thanks to Kevin Lawson, who bought several brand new coats for children and Kathy Ramage and Pam Conrad for buying many, many brand new gloves!

 

Newspapers in Education, a special request by Carole Collett-Wheeler because of her passion for education.

 

Humane Society of Southwest Washington, a special request by Cara Suter because of her passion for animals.

 

Janus Youth Program - Vancouver - a special request by Kathy Ramage and Jenn Stanford because of their passion to help troubled teens.

 

Operation Homefront – Oregon/Southwest Washington - a special request by yours truly, Bonnie Miller, on behalf of the entire Creekside Mortgage team because of the passion we all have to support our troops!  

 

5 Local Families - a special request from Kerry and Becky Greenwald  because of their passion to provide support for struggling families within the community.  We were able to provide car loads of food to each family, and Christmas trees and children’s gifts upon request.

 

As we are closing the books for 2009 it warmed our hearts to see all the good we were able to do this year.   We just felt we needed to thank you again for your business.  We wouldn’t have been able to do this without you.

 

I can’t close this article without giving a special tribute to Kerry Greenwald and all of my co-workers here at Creekside Mortgage, for their particpation, enthusiasm and generosity with the charities this year.  What a great place to work! 

Thanks again for a great year in 2009 and special wishes to you and your family moving forward to 2010.

Happy New Year!

Bonnie Miller

 

 

VA Loans, Defined

December 22nd, 2009

The VA Loan became known in 1944 through the original Servicemen’s Readjustment Act also known as the GI Bill of Rights. The GI Bill was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and provided veterans with a federally guaranteed home with no down payment. This feature was designed to provide housing and assistance for veterans and their families, and the dream of home ownership became a reality for millions of veterans. The GI Bill contributed more than any other program in history to the welfare of veterans and their families, and to the growth of the nation’s economy. 

With more than 25.5 million veterans and service personnel eligible for VA financing, this loan is attractive and has many advantages. Eligibility for the VA loan is defined as Veterans who served on active duty and have a discharge other than dishonorable after a minimum of 90 days of service during wartime or a minimum of 181 continuous days during peacetime. There is a two-year requirement if the veteran enlisted and began service after September 7, 1980 or was an officer and began service after October 16, 1981. There is a six-year requirement for National guards and reservists with certain criteria and there are specific rules concerning the eligibility of surviving spouses.

VA will guarantee a maximum of 25 percent of a home loan amount up to $104,250, which limits the maximum loan amount to $417,000. Generally, the reasonable value of the property or the purchase price, whichever is less, plus the funding fee may be borrowed. All veterans must qualify, for they are not automatically eligible for the program. 

VA guaranteed loans are made by private lenders, such as banks, savings & loans, or mortgage companies to eligible veterans for the purchase of a home, which must be for their own personal occupancy. The guaranty means the lender is protected against loss if you or a later owner fails to repay the loan. The guaranty replaces the protection the lender normally receives by requiring a down payment allowing you to obtain favorable financing terms.

Kevin Lawson

YSP Battle With The Feds !!

December 15th, 2009

The Federal Reserve Board’s proposed changes to Regulation Z/the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) contained in docket No. R-1366 could harm the mortgage-brokerage business as we know it. The Fed will accept comments on the proposed change through Dec. 24, 2009.

Brokers have weathered ill-advised change after ill-advised change during recent times,  and now face the wrath of further harm at the hands of the Fed. The loss of yield-spread premiums would create many issues.

Lets begin here;  if brokers can’t be paid based on the terms of deals they deliver to lenders, how are they going to be compensated? In many cases, brokers will have to charge borrowers greater fees. Many brokers make successful transactions for clients in need, and many of those are extremely difficult ones. Those deals can take months to close, and brokers must make a certain percentage per deal to stay in business.

In addition, the elimination of YSP would further tilt the playing field toward bankers, who could still receive premiums and income from marked-up rates sold to borrowers.

The loss of brokers ultimately will harm consumers, who will be faced with fewer loan options in a less-competitive mortgage market. In addition, the proposed rule could decimate the broker industry and render brokers unable to pay their loan officers. Thus, thousands of people could be out of work, with some signs pointing to Regulation Z changes as a factor.  In this economic climate, does this make any sense??

YSP’s advantages

When mortgage brokers complete a loan for a client, they buy the money at wholesale — at the par rate — and sell it to their clients at retail, thereby earning YSP. This keeps brokers from having to charge more money upfront, which borrowers often wouldn’t be able to afford. The payment of YSP allows:

  • Brokers to make a fair amount for their efforts; and
  • Borrowers to complete a transaction that fits their needs.

If clients aren’t satisfied with what a broker offers them, it’s their option and responsibility to seek a better deal elsewhere. None of this changes brokers’ need to pay for office space, insurance, audits, licensing and bond fees, etc.

Moreover, brokers who fully and clearly disclose their firm’s compensation to clients must discuss with and disclose to borrowers their collection of YSP on multiple occasions, including on the:

  • Current good-faith estimate (GFE);
  • New GFE, which takes effect this coming Jan. 1;
  • Mortgage loan origination agreement;
  • Brokerage business contract;
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-1 settlement statement;
  • Attorney closing instructions that borrowers normally have to acknowledge; and
  • Regulation Z/TILA disclosures that lenders send to borrowers after application.

Brokers could say directly to clients: “I get paid by banks to place your loans with them. Many lenders compete over my business as a broker, and in some cases, they pay me to place your loan with them.” By and large, clients don’t care and won’t care.

Time to act

Now is the time for everyone in the mortgage industry to fight the Fed’s attempt to eliminate YSP. The Fed already more or less owns our banks and financial markets. Are we going to stand by and let them own us, too?

First, consider joining the National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB). NAMB volunteers often are small-business owners, and they want our industry to thrive. The dues members pay to NAMB help fight for our interests in Washington, D.C.

Second, you must personally speak up. Comment on the proposed rule. When you do comment, make sure to explain the destructive impact the rule would have not only on the brokerage industry but also on consumers.

Third, educate your peers, business partners and clients about how the proposed rule will harm small businesses and consumer lending activity, and about how it will increase costs for consumers. Ask your partners and clients — past and current — to comment on the proposed rule. Note that without their help, your business and the opportunities offered by mortgage brokers could disappear.

Kevin Lawson & Scottsman/Guide

SHORT SALES!

December 2nd, 2009

As I am arrranging my current files in my office I realize that 80% of all my current purchases are short sales.. A total of 14 offers to purchase. I have approval, ( verbal- not worth much) on some, some are in the waiting game ( months now) and some at the very beginning of the process.  Closing short sale offers can be a very dicey proposition… A short sale is when,  as an example the home owner owes 200k on their  home and can only sell it for 170k  so the  homeowner is 30k short of having  enough to pay off the existing lien or liens on the property. Here is where the fun begins! A buyer comes along as says fine, I will pay 170k for the home as that is what it is worth now. The seller says great I will take that offer of 170k and we are off an running. The bank or banks that hold the liens on the first and second ( most short sales have a first and second) have to agree on the purchase price and how the amount the sale will be short of covering the existing liens will be handled. ( How much first and second lien holder agree to take in funds or from amount short of  full payment of liens). The fact that you get a seller to sign a contract on their home when it is a short sale really doesnt mean much at all, just that they will agree to the price if the bank does. The decision is completely the bank or banks involved as to whether they are OK with the price. Their will be a negotiator from the bank, there will be a BPO (Broker Price Opinion) done by the bank to see whether the price being offered by the new buyer meets their minumum for current market conditions.  Now when the bank says OK if they do…then the sellers will be presented options from the bank/ banks on how in this case the roughly 30k short to cover existing liens  will be addressed. The bank,banks can forgive the debt, the sellers may have to pay income tax on the 30k   as it is income if the bank forgives the debt, could be a lien which would   have to be paid back some how. Any number of things can happen in the end game. So after waiting for 1-6 months the deal can be off in a matter of minutes if the seller balks or is not willing to go along with the terms the bank / banks offer. Here is a couple examples that have happened to me in the month of Novemeber. With one buyer we waited for 4 months and got the offer approved with the bank and were going to be able to beat the looming foreclosure that would occur if not closed by a specific date. On this home there was a small first mortgage and a large second mortgage. The bank that owned the first mortgage took out a mortgage insurance policy on the second to protect their interest in the property. So… in the eleventh hour after a verbal approval but before the written approval was issued the bank that held the first withdrew their approval and decided to let the home go into foreclosure. This is a business decision and really can not fault the bank for proceeding this way as now they can get the insurance money and most likely collect more money in the final sale of the property  than what my buyer was offering.  My second example was a transaction that had one condition left to get the loan documents out to title… the seller decided to file bankruptcy in the 12th hour which terminated all proceedings in the sale of the home. Now it will be up to a judge. I speculate that the terms the bank offered the seller were not possible for the sellers to meet. Probably figured that better to file Bankruptcy and wait a few years and buy again. So in short …. Short Sales are very time consuming and have a lower chance of funding than a  bank or seller owned property. Tomorrow I will write about what the Feds are doing to put the pressure on banks to expedite,  and standardize the procedure for selling Short Sale Properties.

Michael Frakes

PCS’ing with Professionals !

December 2nd, 2009

First of all I would  highly recommend going to any pre-move briefing available on your base.  Your military husband/wife  most likely must go to this and spouses are encouraged to attend as well.  One of the most valuable things you can do as a moving military family is get connected with a distinguished, professional realtor.  

A realtor with military familiarization, and PCS’ing  in there past is going to afford you a sense of peace when it comes to safely arriving at your intended destination.   In Spokane you have options obviously but Jeannette Karis with Re/Max of Spokane should NOT be overlooked.  Having the 2009 designation of Spokane Association of Realtors President, its my belief that you will be hard pressed to find a more highly qualified candidtate for the job of respresenting you in your transaction.

Jeannette Karis has many designations, awards, educational hours and Spokane Association of Realtors designations as well;  however what makes Jeannette Karis unique, is her passion for what she does.  Not only does she strive to insure that a active military person or a veterans transaction is smooth the entire way through, but she also sincerely cares about people that she works with.  All you have to do is spend a few minutes with Jeannette and this becomes increasingly evident.  This is but a glimpse into the reality of Jeannette’s world, as I could go on for quite sometime. 
To get to the point one must be organized in the PCS move process or you’ll soon be in over your head, you could owe money, have lost goods and have a terrible overall experience.  One way to avoid all of this is to do pro-active homework.  Get a class under your belt and locate a very professional realtor…… if your looking for one of the best.  Look no further than Jeannette Karis.

Kevin J. Lawson

Rules Issued By DOD for Homeowners

November 30th, 2009

Officials have begun evaluating claims under the expanded Homeowners Assistance Program for military homeowners caught in the housing crisis, now that the Defense Department has issued its eligibility rules.

But because of limited funds, officials expect to cut off benefits Dec. 31 for homeowners affected by permanent change-of-station moves, one of the new groups covered under the expanded program. The law had authorized defense officials to run that program through Sept. 30, 2012.

Those who get PCS orders by Dec. 31 will be eligible if they meet other requirements, and they must submit the application by March 31, 2010. The program applies retroactively to those who received PCS orders on or after Feb. 1, 2006.

Mike McCord, Defense Department deputy comptroller said an estimated 10,000 homeowners will be eligible.

The first priority for the $555 million program will be wounded warriors who relocate for medical treatment or medical retirement due to disability, and surviving spouses of those killed in the line of duty. Their benefits will be retroactive to September 11, 2001, and will be permanent for those affected in the future.

According to the Pentagon rules, the government will reimburse eligible homeowners for losses incurred when selling their houses, or will buy houses of those who have been unable to sell.

Officials added one group not included in the law: Coast Guard members who make PCS moves.

• Homeowners must have lost at least 10 percent between the purchase price and sale price of the home, and the home must be in an area that suffered at least a 10 percent decline in housing prices.

• The home’s value must not exceed a cap that ranges between $417,000 and $729,750, depending on location.

• The move must be farther than 50 miles.

• Homeowners under PCS orders or affected by base realignment and closure actions must have purchased the homes before July 1, 2006.

• BRAC homeowners must sell their houses, on the local market or to the government, by Sept. 30, 2012.

How reimbursement will work:

• Wounded warriors, wounded defense or Coast Guard civilians and surviving spouses would receive a cash payment for the difference between their home’s sale price and 95 percent of its prior fair-market value.

• Those in communities where it is proven that the market declined because of a BRAC announcement would receive 95 percent of the home’s prior fair-market value.

• Other BRAC and PCS homeowners would receive up to 90 percent of the home’s prior fair-market value.

Circumstances under which the government will buy the home or pay off the mortgage:

• The government will buy the home only if the homeowner can’t sell it after 120 days on the market at a price deemed appropriate by the Army Corps of Engineers.

• Wounded warriors, wounded defense and Coast Guard civilians and surviving spouses unable to sell their homes will be able to sell to the government for 90 percent of the home’s prior fair-market value.

• For BRAC and PCS homeowners, the government would pay 75 percent of the home’s prior fair-market value.

It is unclear when officials will begin processing payments and buying houses. The regulations are subject to the federal rule-making process, which includes publication in the Federal Register and a comment period.

Kevin J. Lawson

Numbers Suggest Improvement…. Are they for Real??

November 23rd, 2009

In last month’s report from the NAR, existing-home sales  jumped 9.4 percent to an annual rate of 5.57 million units in September from a level of 5.10 million in August. Sales activity was at the highest level since hitting 5.73 million annualized units in July 2007.  Total housing inventory at the end of September fell 7.5 percent to 3.63 million existing homes available for sale, which represented an 7.8-month supply.  The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $174,900 in September,

In this month’s report, existing-home sales surged 10.1 percent to an annual rate of 6.10 million units in October from a downwardly revised pace of 5.54 million in September. Sales activity is at the highest pace since February 2007 when it hit 6.55 million. Total housing inventory at the end of October fell 3.7 percent to 3.57 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.0-month supply at the current sales pace, less than the revised for the worse 8.0-month supply which was reported in September. The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $173,100 in October, down 7.1 percent from October 2008.

From the National Association of Realtors…

Existing-home sales– including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops –surged 10.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.10 million units in October s from a downwardly revised pace of 5.54 million in September, and are 23.5 percent above the 4.94 million-unit level in October 2008.

Sales activity is at the highest pace since February 2007 when it hit 6.55 million.  However we have to remember much of this has do with the current programs that are available to us(the public), and that we the taxpayers are being billed at an astronomical rate…..in which we will have to pay  back.  Someday.  We need to keep these things in mind as our nation gets back on its feet. 

Kevin J. Lawson

Thoughts, Forecasts and Humor….

November 20th, 2009

Right now, companies all over the US are talking about next Friday: Black Friday! Either companies are closed, and the employees have the day off to go spur the economy, or companies are open. Those that are open may have low seniority people at the desks, or people who don’t care about taking the day off and would rather “bite the bullet” and come in for the day after Thanksgiving. US Postal service is in effect, and therefore it counts as a rescission day. But lock desks, and loan sales, will slow down next week with the holiday coming up.

Maybe folks are out there thinking about their upcoming holiday parties, assuming lay-offs have not been too dramatic and they’re actually going to have one.  If your in a position, employed, with holiday party to look forward to consider yourself lucky and blessed.  As we approach these holidays, there is a percentage of the country that is not so well off.  If we have the capacity to help or assist others we should take advantage of that, and make that happen.  For it is time to take action; help those in NEED and realize that there is no better feeling, its the right thing to do.  Simply help when possible.

Like most of America I’ve gained a little weight lately, so I decided that I needed to figure out an exercise routine. I happened upon this one:

“Begin by standing on a comfortable surface, where you have plenty of room at each side. With a 5-LB potato sack in each hand, extend your arms straight out from your sides and hold them there as long as you can.

Try to reach a full minute, and then relax. Each day you’ll find that you can hold this position for just a bit longer.After a couple of weeks, move up to 10-LB potato sacks. Then try0 50-LB potato sacks and then eventually try to get to where you can lift a 100-LB potato sack in each hand and hold your arms straight for more than a full minute.

After you feel confident at that level, put a potato in each sack.

Kevin J. Lawson

Foreclosure & Shortsale… pro’s & Con’s…..

November 19th, 2009

In conversations with Donna Henry, a highly regarded Spokane realtor, she enforces the fact that foreclosures and short sales continue to be a key part of the housing activityin their area. Many analysts feel that the pace of short sales is likely to increase, especially given market conditions and the opinion that short sales are an alternative to foreclosure that can benefit the borrower and the lender. The lender sees potentially lower losses on the loan, and the borrower avoids the stigma of having a foreclosure on their credit history. The government continues to use various tools, such as modifications or foreclosure moratoria (moratoriums?) to prevent more loans from entering the REO market.

The short sale option is mostly offered to borrowers who are ineligible for or have failed to succeed in loan modifications, or just choose not to be modified and are certain to enter foreclosure (or are already there). The program can be economically beneficial to both parties involved.

For the servicer, the four main costs involved in selling the house are:

  • Possible further depreciation in a declining market
  • A discount to the overall market when sold
  • The cost of principal and interest advanced to the trust until the house is sold
  • Repair and maintenance costs.

Foreclosures, which turn into REO situations, typically take longer than a short sale, exposing the parties to more possible depreciation, and few banks & institutions are in the business of owning real estate. In a foreclosure, servicers find that the expenses associated with the liquidation and repair costs are significant, given that foreclosed upon borrowers are unlikely to maintain the property. Most of the benefits of a short sale are due to the shortened timeline and cooperation from the resident. The house would also potentially attract better bids, as it is being actively maintained and lived in.

From the troubled borrower’s viewpoint, they have to decide among a foreclosure or short sale, staying in the house for free until evicted, staying in the house until it is sold in a short sale. A short sale will have a lesser hit on their credit history, and probably be able, if they really want, to buy a house after a few years. Of course there are emotional differences between a foreclosure and a short sale, potential deficiency judgment issues, the stigma of having been foreclosed upon, and tax implications of forgiven debt. The lender typically reports a successful short sale differently from a foreclosure to the credit bureaus although if the loan had gone deeply delinquent prior to completion of a short sale, the hit to credit history would already be significant and, thus, not much different from foreclosure. The biggest advantage to a borrower when opting for a short sale is the timeframe within which a new mortgage loan can be taken out: two years versus (I believe) five for a foreclosure.

Kevin J. Lawson

Mortgage Rates Hold Near Six Month Lows; Loans STILL Locking.

November 18th, 2009

In a rather volatile session, mortgage rates ended yesterday’s session unchanged as a small rally in benchmark Treasuries helped support the MBS market.  Following weaker than expected economic data in the morning, rates rallied. However as profit taking took place later in the day, early session strength was lost and MBS prices returned to opening levels.  Overall, even though prices moved about a relatively wide range, rates remained unchanged on the day.

The Mortgage Bankers’ Association this morning released their weekly applications index. This data tracks the weekly change in the amount of mortgage applications at major lenders.   An increasing trend is positive for the economy in two ways.  First, more home purchases leads to more home construction and consumer spending as the home buyer buys items to fill the new home.  Second, higher amounts of refinancing  should also lead to higher consumer spending as homeowners refinance to lower rates and lower payments giving them more money to spend into the economy.   The report shows that purchase applications have fallen again down 4.7% following last week’s plunge of 11.7%.  The refinance activity posted a modest 1.4% increase following the prior week’s 11.3% increase as homeowners rush to lock in such low mortgage interest rates. 

Kevin J. Lawson

Newer Articles - Article Archive Page 3